Yaqub Ibni Ishaq Al-Kindi (800-873
C.E.)
- Fisika, Optik,
Ilmu Logam, Ilmu Kelautan, Filsafat
Abu Yūsuf Yaʻqūb ibn ʼIsḥāq
aṣ-Ṣabbāḥ al-Kindī (Arabic: أبو يوسف يعقوب
بن إسحاق الصبّاح الكندي,
Latin: Alkindus) (c. 801–873 CE), known as "the Philosopher of the
Arabs", was an Iraqi Muslim Arab philosopher, polymath, mathematician,
physician and musician.
Abu Yousuf Yaqub Ibn Ishaq al-Kindi was born at Kufa around
800 C.E. His father was an official of Haroon al-Rashid. Al-Kindi was a
contemporary of al-Mamun, al-Mu'tasim and al-Mutawakkil and flourished largely
at Baghdad. He vas formally employed by Mutawakkil as
a calligrapher. On account of his philosophical views,
Mutawakkil was annoyed with him and confiscated all his books. These were,
however, returned later on. He died in 873 C.E. during the reign of
al-M'utamid.
Al-Kindi was born and brought up in Kufah, which was a
centre for Arab culture and learning in the 9th century. This was certainly the
right place for al-Kindi to get the best education possible at this time. Although
quite a few details (and legends) of al-Kindi's life are given in various
sources, these are not all consistent. We shall try to give below details which
are fairly well substantiated.
Main interests
Philosophy, logic, ethics, mathematics, physics, chemistry,
psychology, pharmacology, medicine, metaphysics, cosmology, astrology, music
theory, Islamic theology (kalam)
Al-Kindi was the first of the Muslim peripatetic
philosophers, and is unanimously hailed as the "father of Islamic or
Arabic philosophy"[2][3][4] for his synthesis, adaptation and promotion of
Greek and Hellenistic philosophy in the Muslim world.[5]
Al-Kindi was a descendant of the Kinda tribe. He was born
and educated in Basra,[6] before going to pursue further studies in Baghdad.
Al-Kindi became a prominent figure in the House of Wisdom, and a number of
Abbasid Caliphs appointed him to oversee the translation of Greek scientific
and
philosophical
texts into the Arabic language. This contact with "the philosophy of the
ancients" (as Greek philosophy was often referred to by Muslim scholars)
had a profound effect on his intellectual development, and led him to write
hundreds of original treatises of his own on a range of subjects ranging from
metaphysics, ethics, logic and psychology, to medicine, pharmacology,[7]
mathematics, astronomy, astrology and optics, and further afield to more
practical topics like perfumes, swords, jewels, glass, dyes, zoology, tides,
mirrors, meteorology and earthquakes.[8][9]
In the field of mathematics, al-Kindi played an important
role in introducing Indian numerals to the Islamic and Christian world.[10] He
was a pioneer in cryptanalysis and devised several new methods of breaking
ciphers.[11] Using his mathematical and medical expertise, he was able to
develop a scale that would allow doctors to quantify the potency of their
medication.[12]
The central theme underpinning al-Kindi's philosophical
writings is the compatibility between philosophy and other "orthodox"
Islamic sciences, particularly theology. And many of his works deal with
subjects that theology had an immediate interest in. These include the nature
of God, the soul and prophetic knowledge.[13] But despite the important role he
played in making philosophy accessible to Muslim intellectuals, his own
philosophical output was largely overshadowed by that of al-Farabi and very few
of his texts are available for modern scholars to examine.
Al-Kindi was born in Kufa to an aristocratic family of the
Kinda tribe. His father was the governor of Kufa, and al-Kindi received his
preliminary education there. He later went to complete his studies in Baghdad,
where he was patronized by the Abbasid Caliphs al-Ma'mun and al-Mu'tasim. On
account of his learning and aptitude for study, al-Ma'mun appointed him to
House of Wisdom, a recently established centre for the translation of Greek
philosophical and scientific texts, in Baghdad. He was also well known for his
beautiful calligraphy, and at one point was employed as a calligrapher by
al-Mutawakkil.[14]
When al-Ma'mun died, his brother, al-Mu'tasim became Caliph.
Al-Kindi's position would be enhanced under al-Mu'tasim, who appointed him as a
tutor to his son. But on the accession of al-Wathiq, and especially of
al-Mutawakkil, al-Kindi's star waned. There are various theories concerning
this: some attribute al-Kindi's downfall to scholarly rivalries at the House of
Wisdom; others refer to al-Mutawakkil’s often violent persecution of unorthodox
Muslims (as well as of non-Muslims); at one point al-Kindi was beaten and his
library temporarily confiscated. Henry Corbin, an authority on Islamic studies,
says that in 873, al-Kindi died "a lonely man", in Baghdad during the
reign of Al-Mu'tamid.[14]
After his death, al-Kindi's philosophical works quickly fell
into obscurity and many of them were lost even to later Islamic scholars and
historians. Felix Klein-Franke suggests a number of reasons for this: aside
from the militant orthodoxy of al-Mutawakkil, the Mongols also destroyed
countless libraries during their invasion. However, he says the most probable
cause of this was that his writings never found popularity amongst subsequent
influential philosophers such as al-Farabi and Avicenna, who ultimately
overshadowed him.[15]
Accomplishments
Al-Kindi was a master of many different areas of thought.
And although he would eventually be eclipsed by names such as al-Farabi and
Avicenna, he was held to be one of the greatest Islamic philosophers of his
time.
The Italian Renaissance scholar Geralomo Cardano (1501–1575)
considered him one of the twelve greatest minds of the Middle Ages.[16]
According to Ibn al-Nadim, al-Kindi wrote at least two hundred and sixty books,
contributing heavily to geometry (thirty-two books), medicine and philosophy
(twenty-two books each), logic (nine books), and physics (twelve books).[17]
His influence in the fields of physics, mathematics, medicine, philosophy and
music were far-reaching and lasted for several centuries. Although most of his
books have been lost over the centuries, a few have survived in the form of
Latin translations by Gerard of Cremona, and others have been rediscovered in
Arabic manuscripts; most importantly, twenty-four of his lost works were
located in the mid-twentieth century in a Turkish library.[18]
Philosophy
His greatest contribution to the development of Islamic
philosophy was his efforts to make Greek thought both accessible and acceptable
to a Muslim audience. Al-Kindi carried out this mission from the House of
Wisdom (Bayt al-Hikma), an institute of translation and learning patronized by
the Abbasid Caliphs, in Baghdad.[14] As well as translating many important
texts, much of what was to become standard Arabic philosophical vocabulary
originated with al-Kindi; indeed, if it had not been for him, the work of
philosophers like Al-Farabi, Avicenna, and al-Ghazali might not have been
possible.[19]
In his writings, one of al-Kindi's central concerns was to
demonstrate the compatibility between philosophy and natural theology on the
one hand, and revealed or speculative theology on the other (though in fact he
rejected speculative theology). Despite this, he did make clear that he
believed revelation was a superior source of knowledge to reason because it
guaranteed matters of faith that reason could not uncover. And while his
philosophical approach was not always original, and was even considered clumsy
by later thinkers (mainly because he was the first philosopher writing in the
Arabic language), he successfully incorporated Aristotelian and (especially)
neo-Platonist thought into an Islamic philosophical framework. This was an
important factor in the introduction and popularization of Greek philosophy in
the Muslim intellectual world.[20]
Astronomy
Al-Kindi took his view of the solar system from Ptolemy, who
placed the Earth at the centre of a series of concentric spheres, in which the
known heavenly bodies (the Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, and
the stars) are embedded. In one of his treatises on the subject, he says that
these bodies are rational entities, whose circular motion is in obedience to
and worship of God. Their role, al-Kindi believes, is to act as instruments for
divine providence. He furnishes empirical evidence as proof for this assertion;
different seasons are marked by particular arrangements of the planets and
stars (most notably the sun); the appearance and manner of people varies
according to the arrangement of heavenly bodies situated above their
homeland.[21]
However, he is ambiguous when it comes to the actual process
by which the heavenly bodies affect the material world. One theory he posits in
his works is from Aristotle, who conceived that the movement of these bodies
causes friction in the sub-lunar region, which stirs up the primary elements of
earth, fire, air and water, and these combine to produce everything in the
material world. An alternative view found his treatise On Rays is that the
planets exercise their influence in straight lines. In each of these, he
presents two fundamentally different views of physical interaction; action by
contact and action at a distance. This dichotomy is duplicated in his writings
on optics.[22]
Some of the notable astrological works by al-Kindi
include:[23]
The Book of the Judgement of the Stars, including The
Forty Chapters, on questions and elections.
On the Stellar Rays.
Several epistles on weather and meteorology, including De
mutatione temporum, ("On the Changing of the Weather").
Treatise on the Judgement of Eclipses.
Treatise on the Dominion of the Arabs and its Duration
(used to predict the end of Arab rule).
The Choices of Days (on elections).
On the Revolutions of the Years (on mundane astrology and
natal revolutions).
De Signis Astronomiae Applicitis as Mediciam ‘On the
Signs of Astronomy as applied to Medicine’
Treatise on the Spirituality of the Planets.
Optics
Two major theories of optics appear in the writings of
al-Kindi; Aristotelian and Euclidian. Aristotle had believed that in order for
the eye to perceive an object, both the eye and the object must be in contact
with a transparent medium (such as air) that is filled with light. When these
criteria are met, the "sensible form" of the object is transmitted
through the medium to the eye. On the other hand, Euclid proposed that vision
occurred in straight lines when "rays" from the eye reached an
illuminated object and were reflected back. As with his theories on Astrology,
the dichotomy of contact and distance is present in al-Kindi's writings on this
subject as well.
The factor which al-Kindi relied upon to determine which of
these theories was most correct was how adequately each one explained the
experience of seeing. For example, Aristotle's theory was unable to account for
why the angle at which an individual sees an object affects his perception of
it. For example, why a circle viewed from the side will appear as a line.
According to Aristotle, the complete sensible form of a circle should be
transmitted to the eye and it should appear as a circle. On the other hand,
Euclidian optics provided a geometric model that was able to account for this,
as well as the length of shadows and reflections in mirrors, because Euclid
believed that the visual "rays" could only travel in straight lines
(something which is commonly accepted in modern science). For this reason,
al-Kindi considered the latter preponderant.[24]
Through the Latin version of the De Aspectibus, Al-Kindi
partly influenced the optical investigations of Robert Grosseteste.[25]
Medicine
There are more than thirty treatises attributed to al-Kindi
in the field of medicine, in which he was chiefly influenced by the ideas of
Galen.[26] His most important work in this field is probably De Gradibus, in
which he demonstrates the application of mathematics to medicine, particularly
in the field of pharmacology. For example, he developed a mathematical scale to
quantify the strength of drug and a system, based the phases of the moon, that
would allow a doctor to determine in advance the most critical days of a
patient's illness.[12]
Chemistry
As an advanced chemist, he was also an opponent of alchemy;
he debunked the myth that simple, base metals could be transformed into
precious metals such as gold or silver.[27] He is sometimes credited as one of
the first distillers of alcohol.
Alkindi also studies more about Isters that concern term of
organic in chemistry.
Mathematics
Al-Kindi authored works on a number of important
mathematical subjects, including arithmetic, geometry, the Indian numbers, the
harmony of numbers, lines and multiplication with numbers, relative quantities,
measuring proportion and time, and numerical procedures and cancellation.[10]
He also wrote four volumes, On the Use of the Indian Numerals (Ketab fi
Isti'mal al-'Adad al-Hindi) which contributed greatly to diffusion of the
Indian system of numeration in the Middle-East and the West. In geometry, among
other works, he wrote on the theory of parallels. Also related to geometry were
two works on optics. One of the ways in which he made use of mathematics as a
philosopher was to attempt to disprove the eternity of the world by
demonstrating that actual infinity is a mathematical and logical absurdity.[28]
The first page of al-Kindi's manuscript "On Deciphering
Cryptographic Messages", containing the oldest known description of
cryptanalysis by frequency analysis.
Cryptography
Al-Kindi is credited with developing a method whereby
variations in the frequency of the occurrence of letters could be analyzed and
exploited to break ciphers (i.e. cryptanalysis by frequency analysis).[11]
Music theory
Al-Kindi was the first great theoretician of music in the
Arab-Islamic world. He is known to have written fifteen treatises on music
theory, but only five have survived. He added a fifth string to the 'ud.[29]
His works included discussions on the therapeutic value of music[30] and what
he regarded as "cosmological connections" of music.[31]
Philosophical thought
Influences
While Muslim intellectuals were already acquainted with
Greek philosophy (especially logic), al-Kindi is credited with being the first
real Muslim philosopher.[32] His own thought was largely influenced by the
Neo-Platonic philosophy of Proclus, Plotinus and John Philoponus, amongst
others, although he does appear to have borrowed ideas from other Hellenistic
schools as well.[33] He makes many references to Aristotle in his writings, but
these are often unwittingly re-interpreted in a Neo-Platonic framework. This
trend is most obvious in areas such as metaphysics and the nature of God as a
causal entity.[34] Earlier experts had suggested that he was influenced by the
Mutazilite school of theology, because of the mutual concern both he and they
demonstrated for maintaining the singularity (tawhid) of God. However, such
agreements are now considered incidental, as further study has shown that they
disagreed on a number of equally important topics.[35]
Metaphysics
According to al-Kindi, the goal of metaphysics is the
knowledge of God. For this reason, he does not make a clear distinction between
philosophy and theology, because he believes they are both concerned with the
same subject. Later philosophers, particularly al-Farabi and Avicenna, would
strongly disagree with him on this issue, by saying that metaphysics is
actually concerned with being qua being, and as such, the nature of God is
purely incidental.[13]
Central to al-Kindi's understanding of metaphysics is God's
absolute oneness, which he considers an attribute uniquely associated with God
(and therefore not shared with anything else). By this he means that while we
may think of any existent thing as being "one", it is in fact both
"one" and many". For example, he says that while a body is one,
it is also composed of many different parts. A person might say "I see an
elephant", by which he means "I see one elephant", but the term
'elephant' refers to a species of animal that contains many. Therefore, only
God is absolutely one, both in being and in concept, lacking any multiplicity
whatsoever. Some feel this understanding entails a very rigorous negative
theology because it implies that any description which can be predicated to
anything else, cannot be said about God.[35][36]
In addition to absolute oneness, al-Kindi also described God
as the Creator. This means that He acts as both a final and efficient cause.
Unlike later Muslim Neo-Platonic philosophers (who asserted that the universe
existed as a result of God's existence "overflowing", which is a
passive act), al-Kindi conceived of God as an active agent. In fact, of God as
the agent, because all other intermediary agencies are contingent upon Him.[37]
The key idea here is that God "acts" through created intermediaries,
which in turn "act" on one another – through a chain of cause and
effect – to produce the desired result. In reality, these intermediary agents
do not "act" at all, they are merely a conduit for God's own
action.[34] This is especially significant in the development of Islamic
philosophy, as it portrayed the "first cause" and "unmoved
mover" of Aristotelian philosophy as compatible with the concept of God
according to Islamic revelation.[38]
Epistemology
Ancient Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle would
become highly revered in the medieval Islamic world.
Al-Kindi theorized that there was a separate, incorporeal
and universal intellect (known as the "First Intellect"). It was the
first of God's creation and the intermediary through which all other things
came into creation. Aside from its obvious metaphysical importance, it was also
crucial to al-Kindi's epistemology, which was influenced by Platonic
realism.[39]
According to Plato, everything that exists in the material
world corresponds to certain universal forms in the heavenly realm. These forms
are really abstract concepts such as a species, quality or relation, which
apply to all physical objects and beings. For example, a red apple has the
quality of "redness" derived from the appropriate universal. However,
al-Kindi says that human intellects are only potentially able to comprehend
these. This potential is actualized by the First Intellect, which is perpetually
thinking about all of the universals. He argues that the external agency of
this intellect is necessary by saying that human beings cannot arrive at a
universal concept merely through perception. In other words, an intellect
cannot understand the species of a thing simply by examining one or more of its
instances. According to him, this will only yield an inferior "sensible
form", and not the universal form which we desire. The universal form can
only be attained through contemplation and actualization by the First
Intellect.[40]
The analogy he provides to explain his theory is that of
wood and fire. Wood, he argues, is potentially hot (just as a human is
potentially thinking about a universal), and therefore requires something else
which is already hot (such as fire) to actualize this. This means that for the
human intellect to think about something, the First Intellect must already be
thinking about it. Therefore he says that the First Intellect must always be
thinking about everything. Once the human intellect comprehends a universal by
this process, it becomes part of the individual's "acquired
intellect" and can be thought about whenever he or she wishes.[41]
The soul and the afterlife
Al-Kindi says that
the soul is a simple, immaterial substance, which is related to the material
world only because of its faculties which operate through the physical body. To
explain the nature of our worldly existence, he (borrowing from Epictetus)
compares it to a ship which has, during the course of its ocean voyage, temporarily
anchored itself at an island and allowed its passengers to disembark. The
implicit warning is that those passengers who linger too long on the island may
be left behind when the ship sets sail again. Here, al-Kindi displays a stoic
concept, that we must not become attached to material things (represented by
the island), as they will invariably be taken away from us (when the ship sets
sail again). He then connects this with a Neo-Platonist idea, by saying that
our soul can be directed towards the pursuit of desire or the pursuit of
intellect; the former will tie it to the body, so that when the body dies, it
will also die, but the latter will free it from the body and allow it to
survive "in the light of the Creator" in a realm of pure intelligence.[42]
The relationship between revelation and philosophy
In the view of al-Kindi, prophecy and philosophy were two
different routes to arrive at the truth. He contrasts the two positions in four
ways. Firstly, while a person must undergo a long period of training and study
to become a philosopher, prophecy is bestowed upon someone by God. Secondly,
the philosopher must arrive at the truth by his own devices (and with great
difficulty), whereas the prophet has the truth revealed to him by God. Thirdly,
the understanding of the prophet – being divinely revealed – is clearer and
more comprehensive than that of the philosopher. Fourthly, the way in which the
prophet is able to express this understanding to the ordinary people is
superior. Therefore al-Kindi says the prophet is superior in two fields: the
ease and certainty with which he receives the truth, and the way in which he
presents it. However, the crucial implication is that the content of the
prophet's and the philosopher's knowledge is the same. This, says Adamson,
demonstrates how limited the superiority al-Kindi afforded to prophecy
was.[43][44]
In addition to this, al-Kindi adopted a naturalistic view of
prophetic visions. He argued that, through the faculty of
"imagination" as conceived of in Aristotelian philosophy, certain
"pure" and well-prepared souls, were able to receive information
about future events. Significantly, he does not attribute such visions or
dreams to revelation from God, but instead explains that imagination enables human
beings to receive the "form" of something without needing to perceive
the physical entity to which it refers. Therefore, it would seem to imply that
anyone who has purified themselves would be able to receive such visions. It is
precisely this idea, amongst other naturalistic explanations of prophetic
miracles that al-Ghazali attacks in his Incoherence of the Philosophers.[45]
Critics and patrons
While al-Kindi appreciated the usefulness of philosophy in
answering questions of a religious nature, there would be many Islamic thinkers
who were not as enthusiastic about its potential. But it would be incorrect to
assume that they opposed philosophy simply because it was a "foreign
science". Oliver Leaman, an expert on Islamic philosophy, points out that
the objections of notable theologians are rarely directed at philosophy itself,
but rather at the conclusions the philosophers arrived at. Even al-Ghazali, who
is famous for his critique of the philosophers, was himself an expert in
philosophy and logic. And his criticism was that they arrived at theologically
erroneous conclusions. The three most serious of these, in his view, were
believing in the co-eternity of the universe with God, denying the bodily
resurrection, and asserting that God only has knowledge of abstract universals,
not of particular things (not all philosophers subscribed to these same
views).[46]
During his life, al-Kindi was fortunate enough to enjoy the
patronage of the pro-Mutazilite Caliphs al-Ma'mun and al-Mu'tasim, which meant
he could carry out his philosophical speculations with relative ease. In his
own time, al-Kindi would be criticized for extolling the "intellect"
as being the most immanent creation in proximity to God, which was commonly
held to be the position of the angels.[47] He also engaged in disputations with
the Mutazilites, whom he attacked for their belief in atoms.[48] But the real
role of al-Kindi in the conflict between philosophers and theologians would be
to prepare the ground for debate. His works, says Deborah Black, contained all
the seeds of future controversy that would be fully realized in al-Ghazali's
Incoherence of the Philosophers.[49]
According to [3], al-Kindi's father was the governor of
Kufah, as his grandfather had been before him. Certainly all agree that
al-Kindi was descended from the Royal Kindah tribe which had originated in
southern Arabia. This tribe had united a number of tribes and reached a
position of prominence in the 5th and 6th centuries but then lost
power from the middle of the 6th century. However, descendants of the Royal
Kindah continued to hold prominent court positions in Muslim times.
After beginning his education in Kufah, al-Kindi moved to
Baghdad to complete his studies and there he quickly achieved fame for his
scholarship. He came to the attention of the Caliph al-Ma'mun who was at that
time setting up the "House of Wisdom"
in Baghdad. Al-Ma'mun had won an armed struggle against his
brother in 813 and became Caliph in that year. He ruled his empire, first from
Merv then, after 818, he ruled from Baghdad where he had to go to put down an
attempted coup.
Al-Ma'mun was a patron of learning and founded an academy
called the House of Wisdomwhere Greek philosophical and scientific works were
translated. Al-Kindi was appointed by alMa'mun to the House of Wisdomtogether
with al-Khwarizmi and the Banu Musa brothers. The main task that al-Kindi and
his colleagues undertook in the House of Wisdominvolved the translation of
Greek scientific manuscripts. Al-Ma'mun had built up a library of manuscripts,
the first major library to be set up since that at Alexandria, collecting
important works from Byzantium.
In addition to theHouse of Wisdom, al-Ma'mun set up
observatories in which Muslim astronomers could build on the knowledge acquired
by earlier peoples.
In 833 al-Ma'mun died and was succeeded by his brother
alMu'tasim. Al-Kindi continued to be in favour and al-Mu'tasim employed
al-Kindi to tutor his son Ahmad. Al-Mu'tasim died in 842 and was succeeded by al-Wathiq who, in
turn, was succeeded as Caliph in 847 by al-Mutawakkil. Under both these Caliphs
al-Kindi fared less well. It is not entirely clear whether
this was because of his religious views or because of internal arguments and
rivalry between the scholars in the House of Wisdom. Certainly al-Mutawakkil
persecuted all non-orthodox and non-Muslim groups while he had synagogues and
churches in Baghdad destroyed. However, al-Kindi's [6]:- ... lack of interest
in religious argument can be seen in the topics on which he wrote. ... he
appears to coexist with the world view of orthodox Islam.
In fact most of al-Kindi's philosophical writings seem
designed to show that he believed that the pursuit of philosophy is compatible
with Islam. This would seem to indicate that it is more probably that al-Kindi
became [1]:- ... the victim of such
rivals as the mathematicians Banu Musa and the astrologer Abu Ma'shar.
It is claimed that the Banu Musa brothers caused al-Kindi to
lose favour with al-Mutawakkil to the extent that he had him beaten and gave
al-Kindi's library to the Banu Musa brothers.
Al-Kindi was best known as a philosopher but he was also a
mathematician and scientist of importance [3]:-
To his people he became known as ... the philosopher of the
Arabs. He was the only notable philosopher of pure Arabian blood and the first
one in Islam. Al-Kindi "was the most leaned of his age, unique among his
contemporaries in the knowledge of the totality of ancient scientists,
embracing logic, philosophy, geometry, mathematics, music and astrology.
Perhaps, rather surprisingly for a man of such learning
whose was employed to translate Greek texts, al-Kindi does not appear to have
been fluent enough in Greek to do the translation himself. Rather he polished
the translations made by others and wrote commentaries on many Greek works.
Clearly he was most influenced most strongly by the writings of Aristotle but
the influence of Plato, Porphyry and Proclus can also be seen in alKindi's
ideas. We should certainly not give the impression that al-Kindi merely
borrowed from these earlier writer, for he built their ideas into an overall
scheme which was certainly his own invention.
Al-Kindi wrote many works on arithmetic which included
manuscripts on Indian numbers, the harmony of numbers, lines and multiplication
with numbers, relative quantities, measuring proportion and time, and numerical
procedures and cancellation.
He also wrote on space and time, both of which he believed
were finite, 'proving' his assertion with a paradox of the infinite. Garro
gives al-Kindi's 'proof' that the existence of an actual infinite body or
magnitude leads to a contradiction in [7]. In his more recent paper [8], Garro
formulates the informal axiomatics of al-Kindi's paradox of the infinite in modern terms and
discusses the paradox both from a mathematical and philosophical point of
view. In geometry al-Kindi wrote, among
other works, on the theory of parallels. He gave a lemma investigating the
possibility of exhibiting pairs of lines in the plane which are simultaneously
non-parallel and non-intersecting. Also related to geometry was the two works
he wrote on optics, although he followed the usual practice of the time and
confused the theory of light and the theory of vision. Perhaps al-Kindi's own words give the best
indication of what he attempted to do in all his work. In the introduction to
one of his books he wrote (see for example [1]):-
It is good ... that we endeavour in this book, as is our
habit in all subjects, to recall that concerning which the Ancients have said
everything in the past, that is the easiest and shortest to adopt for those who
follow them, and to go further in those areas where they have not said
everything ...
Certainly al-Kindi tried hard to follow this path. For
example in his work on optics he is critical of a Greek description by
Anthemius of how a mirror was used to set a ship on fire during a battle.
Al-Kindi adopts a more scientific approach (see for example [1]):-
Anthemius should not have accepted information without proof
...He tells us how to construct a mirror from which twenty-four rays are
reflected on a single point, without showing how to establish the
point where the rays unite at a given distance from the
middle of the mirror's surface. We, on the other hand, have described this with
as much evidence as our ability permits, furnishing what was missing, for he
has not mentioned a definite distance.
Much of al-Kindi's work remains to be studied closely or has
only recently been subjected to scholarly research. For example al-Kindi's
commentary on Archimedes' The measurement of the circle has only received
careful attention as recently as the 1993
publication [10] by Rashed. In
chemistry, he opposed the idea that base metals can be converted to precious
metals. In contrast to prevailing alchemical views, he was emphatic that
chemical reactions cannot bring about the transformation of elements. In
physics, he made rich contributions to geometrical optics and wrote a book on
it. This book later on provided guidance and inspiration to such eminent scientists
as Roger Bacon. In medicine, his chief contribution comprises the fact that he
was the first to systematically determine the doses to be administered of all
the drugs known at his time. This resolved the conflic- ting views prevailing
among physicians on the dosage that caused difficulties in writing recipes.
Very little was known on the scientific aspects of music in his time. He
pointed out that the various notes that combine to produce harmony, have a
specific pitch each. Thus, notes with too low or too high a pitch are
non-pleatant. The degree of harmony depends on the frequency of notes, etc. He
also pointed out the fact that when a sound is produced, it generates waves in
the air which strike the ear-drum. His work contains a notation on the determination
of pitch.
He was a prolific writer, the total number of books written
by him was 241, the prominent among which were divided
In addition, various monographs written by him concern
tides, astronomical instruments, rocks, precious stones, etc. He was also an
early translator of Greek works into Arabic, but this fact has largely been
over-shadowed by his numerous original writings. It is unfortunate that most of
his books are no longer extant, but those existing speak very high of his
standard of scholarship and contribution. He was known as Alkindus in Latin and
a large number of his books were translated into Latin by Gherard of Cremona.
His books that were translated into Latin
during the Middle Ages comprise Risalah dar Tanjim,
Ikhtiyarat alAyyam, Ilahyat-e-Aristu, al-Mosiqa, Mad-o-Jazr, and Aduiyah
Murakkaba.
Al-Kindi's influence on development of science and
philosophy was significant in the revival of sciences in that period. In the
Middle Ages, Cardano considered him as one of the twelve greatest minds. His
works, in fact, lead to further development of various subjects for centuries,
notably physics, mathematics, medicine and music.
Ibn Ishaq Al-Kindi (Latinized, Alkindus.) Philosophy, Physics, Optics,
Medicine, Mathematics, Cryptography, Metallurgy. Worked at the House of Wisdom
which was set up in 810. He introduces quantification into medicine in his De
Gradibus.
He also writes on the distillation of wine as that of rose water and gives
107 recipes for perfumes, in his book Kitab Kimia al-`otoor wa al-tas`eedat
(book of the chemistry of perfumes and distillations.)
Ia adalah
ilmuwan jenius yang hidup di era kejayaan Islam Baghdad. Saat itu, panji-panji
kejayaan Islam dikerek oleh Dinasti Abbasiyah. Tak kurang dari lima periode
khalifah dilaluinya, yaknial-Amin (809-813), al-Ma’mun (813-833), al-Mu’tasim, al-Wasiq
(842-847), dan Mutawakil (847-861).
Kepandaian
dan kemampuannya dalam menguasai berbagai ilmu, termasuk kedokteran, membuatnya
diangkat menjadi guru dan tabib kerajaan. Khalifah juga mempercayainya untuk
berkiprah di Baitulhikmah yang kala itu gencar menerjemahkan buku-buku ilmu
pengetahuan dari berbagai bahasa, seperti Yunani.
Ketika
Khalifah al-Ma’mun tutup usia dan digantikan putranya, al-Mu’tasim, posisi
al-Kindi semakin diperhitungkan dan mendapatkan peran yang besar. Dia secara
khusus diangkat menjadi guru bagi putranya. Al-Kindi mampu menghidupkan paham
Muktazilah. Berkat peran Al-Kindi pula, paham yang mengutamakan rasionalitas
itu ditetapkan sebagai paham resmi kerajaan.
Menurut
al-Nadhim, selama berkutat dan bergelut dengan ilmu pengetahuan di
Baitulhikmah, al-Kindi telah melahirkan 260 karya. Di antara sederet buah
pikirnya itu telah dituangkan dalam risalah-risalah pendek yang tak lagi
ditemukan. Karya-karya yang dihasilkannya menunjukan bahwa Al-Kindi adalah
seorang yang berilmu pengetahuan yang luas dan dalam.
Ratusan
karyanya itu dipilah ke berbagai bidang, seperti filsafat, logika, ilmu hitung,
musik, astronomi, geometri, medis, astrologi, dialektika, psikologi, politik,
dan meteorologi. Bukunya yang paling banyak adalah geometri sebanyak 32 judul.
Filsafat dan kedokteran masing-masing mencapai 22 judul. Logika sebanyak
sembilan judul dan fisika 12 judul.
Ibn
Ishaq Al-Kindi (Latinized, Alkindus.) Philosophy, Physics, Optics, Medicine,
Mathematics, Cryptography, Metallurgy. Worked at the House of Wisdom which was
set up in 810. He introduces quantification into medicine in his De
Gradibus.
Bayt al-Hikma (House of Wisdom) set up in Baghdad. There Greek and Indian mathematical and astronomy works are translated into Arabic.
Al-Kindi writes on the distillation of wine as that of rose water and gives 107 recipes for perfumes, in his book Kitab Kimia al-`otoor wa al-tas`eedat (book of the chemistry of perfumes and distillations.)
Bayt al-Hikma (House of Wisdom) set up in Baghdad. There Greek and Indian mathematical and astronomy works are translated into Arabic.
Al-Kindi writes on the distillation of wine as that of rose water and gives 107 recipes for perfumes, in his book Kitab Kimia al-`otoor wa al-tas`eedat (book of the chemistry of perfumes and distillations.)
Reference:
1. Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New
York 1970-1990).
2. G N Atiyeh, Al-Kindi : The philosopher of the Arabs
(Karachi, 1966).
3. A A al'Daffa, The Muslim contribution to mathematics
(London, 1978).
4. J Jolivet, L'Intellect selon Kindi (Leiden, 1971).
5. P G Bulgakov and A A Ahmedov, al-Biruni and al-Kindi
on the theory of
parallels (Russian), Obshchestv. Nauki v Uzbek. 8 (1977),
30-36.
6. E Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy 5
(London-New
York, 1998), 250-252.
7. I Garro, al-Kindi and mathematical logic, Internat.
Logic Rev. No. 17-18
(1978), 145-149.
8. I Garro, The paradox of the infinite by al-Kindi, J.
Hist. Arabic Sci. 10 (1-2) (1994), 111-118, 143.
9. M Moosa, Al-Kindi's role in the transmission of Greek
knowledge to the
Arabs, J. Pakistan Hist. Soc. 15 (1967), 3-18.
10. R Rashed, al-Kindi's commentary on Archimedes' The
measurement of
the circle, Arabic Sci. Philos. 3 (1) (1993), 7-53.
11. R Rashed, Le commentaire par al-Kindi de l'Optique
d'Euclide : un traité
jusqu'ici inconnu, Arabic Sci. Philos. 7 (1) (1997), 3,
5, 9-56.
12. S M Stern, Notes on al-Kindi's treatise on
definitions, J. Royal Asiatic Soc. (1-2) (1959), 32-43.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar